By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Soundwave said:
zeldaring said:

200 million people with ps5 level hardware is not a small festish of people. They wanna play there games at the best possible perfomance they can afford, now naming a few games that didn't even bomb and only did ok is not gonna stop thirdpartys from wanting to stand  out graphically. It's like saying graphics don't matter because Xbox flopped against ps2 or many games with great graphics like kill zone franchise didn't sell amazing as well. Bouncer and many more.

Again my point is the majority of those people are not like "you" guys (the 3-4 people that flood every thread with their personal preferences. I know it may be shocking but not everyone buys hardware for the same reason as you, nor does owning a PC = graphics driven gamer enthusiast). 

The sales of games that are banking hard on being sold on graphics primarily are showing shockingly low sales. Even for games that are critically acclaimed or have significant marketing behind them. 

Now maybe we could discuss that and not "well I can only enjoy games if it's like this" ... like it adds nothing of value to a market wide discussion. 

The games you mention have never been big to begin with  lol just cherry picked to push your agenda. Final was the only worth mentioning the series is being released way too often and On a decline it happens.

I can't think of many reasons to buy a pc with a gpu better then ps5 and also have steam account  if not for gaming, but keep pushing your anecdotal evidence as strong data points. 

Who the hell said you have to be a enthusiast to want better perfomace and graphics lol that's something gamers have come to expect with every gen. The funniest part about all this for months now you been  pushing false data saying most pc users are using something close to a 2050 lol as your main reason gamers don't care about graphics anymore except old farts.

Last edited by zeldaring - on 10 June 2024