By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
HoloDust said:
pikashoe said:

Yikes even worse. It doesn't seem to be very low, why else bring up the film degree. As in all things there are subjective and objective aspects even in art. Stories and films in particular are full of rules that while can be broken are usually followed and have to be understood before they can be broken. Surely wherever you studied film told you to actually back up your criticisms. Why come in here make a statement and then not even back it up. You cared enough to let everyone know what you thought but not enough to even let anyone understand why? It just seems like you have nothing to actually add to this discussion and were saying something controversial for the sake of being. Being honest I am actually interested why you think the way you do about the film.

There seem to be two things you don't seem to grasp (maybe that's age related):

1) most things in life are POV, not objective, and that goes double for art

2)

Ok got it, so you don't actually have anything to back up your pov or add to the discussion. Honestly would have assumed you were a teenager if you hadn't said you were in your 50s.