By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
HoloDust said:
pikashoe said:

Oh wow, I also studied film, honestly kind of immature to try and bring that up as some kind of way dismiss me, you're in your 40s and you're trying to win argument by just saying you have a film degree, grow up. Come on give a few reasons why it's bland and disjointed. This is a discussion forum if you're going to say a controversial statement you should actually try to back it up. I am genuinely interested how you weren't able to follow what was going on and how it's bland. 

Again you can not like something and appreciate that it is still well made. For example I didn't like Sicario, but I still think it's an incredibly well made film, just not something I connected with. I'm not saying my worldview is objective but there are subjective and objective aspects to everything. 

I'm in my 50s, so wining an argument over some film on the net is fairly at the bottom of my priorities. I don't know where you studied film, but you should have written bazillion of essays on films while you were studying, so really surprised that you insist of "objectivity" in art.

Bur, as I said, carry on, nothing to see here.

Yikes even worse. It doesn't seem to be very low, why else bring up the film degree. As in all things there are subjective and objective aspects even in art. Stories and films in particular are full of rules that while can be broken are usually followed and have to be understood before they can be broken. Surely wherever you studied film told you to actually back up your criticisms. Why come in here make a statement and then not even back it up. You cared enough to let everyone know what you thought but not enough to even let anyone understand why? It just seems like you have nothing to actually add to this discussion and were saying something controversial for the sake of being. Being honest I am actually interested why you think the way you do about the film.