Farsala said:
Now it seems you are missing the point. In my original post I said games that get ported to Switch tend to be the ones that are guaranteed to be profitable/viable. You countered by saying Switch ports aren't expensive or risky. I responded by saying if they aren't expensive or risky, then the 3rd party support would be booming like Sony or PC. And then our recent posts. You get what I am saying now? I didn't say all the ports weren't viable, just that devs pick and choose the ones more guaranteed. But I still disagree that isn't expensive or risky for all the other games that weren't ported. |
We were talking about FF7. If it's apparently viable to port much smaller stuff like Sniper Elite or Zombie Army, I doubt FF7 is going to have trouble getting attention on a Switch successor.
And expensive is relative; porting, even across platforms of different power levels, is a lot cheaper than building a modern AAA game from the ground up, was the point.