By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Soundwave said:
Chrkeller said:

More modern chip, yep.  Way slower memory bandwidth, yep.

I think it largely neutralizes as a ps4 like output. 

Which for a portable is excellent.

So get over yourself.  

Again you say that stuff but you don't really know what you're talking about. Nvidia's tile based rendering doesn't require equivalent bandwidth to AMD especially AMD's now ancient GCN architecture. 

Or how do you think a 2050 GPU with less bandwidth than a Switch 2 is running modern games like Alan Wake 2 whereas a PS4 can't? 

When something like that gets pointed out, you just cover your ears and continue with the agenda. So see, the whole "now lets all be friends and play games" act doesn't hold, you can see the mask slipping right here. 

Not even a little bit.  I've gamed on a 3050, 4070 and 4090.  I'm well aware of what to expect from a 50 series GPU.  Halo Infinite on a 3050 is low resolution, low fps and meh settings.  Playable?  Absolutely.  A 3050 isn't what you make it out to be.  

Currently in my house I have three computers (3050, 4070 and 4090), 3 switch units and a ps5.  Everything I post about performance is directly from hands on experience.  Not parroting some odd magical wishlist.  

And yeah, I think console wars are stupid.  Everything has pros and cons, including Nintendo.  But you refuse to accept Nintendo is anything other than perfect.  Which makes one of us a gamer and the other, not so much.  

Last edited by Chrkeller - on 23 May 2024

i7-13700k

Vengeance 32 gb

RTX 4090 Ventus 3x E OC

Switch OLED