By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chrkeller said:
Soundwave said:

The problem is on a technical basis you often don't know what you're talking about, which is fine, and it's fine to have that opinion, it becomes a problem when you interject that into every Switch 2 discussion like it's a stone cold fact because you need to gatekeep technology.

A Tegra T239 is going to be architecturally superior to a PS4 in large respects for example. It's a much more modern chip than a PS4 with a much better architecture. That's more rooted in actual reality and not just opinion ... for example. If Nintendo wanted just a "portable PS4" they could have gone with something quite a good deal lower than that. 

More modern chip, yep.  Way slower memory bandwidth, yep.

I think it largely neutralizes as a ps4 like output. 

Which for a portable is excellent.

So get over yourself.  

Again you say that stuff but you don't really know what you're talking about. Nvidia's tile based rendering doesn't require equivalent bandwidth to AMD especially AMD's now ancient GCN architecture. 

Or how do you think a 2050 GPU with less bandwidth than a Switch 2 is running modern games like Alan Wake 2 whereas a PS4 can't? 

When something like that gets pointed out, you just cover your ears and continue with the agenda. So see, the whole "now lets all be friends and play games" act doesn't hold, you can see the mask slipping right here.