curl-6 said:
What looks better is a matter of personal opinion. I'm talking about which is actually more graphically capable or demanding. |
That's what those two posters do (errr, is it really even 2?), when they get pinned against a technical fact they just spin it as they personally don't like it or they play on such and such a GPU, as if that negates the facts by moving goal posts.
Anyone that suggests that Nintendo isn't using the worst hardware imaginable like the Switch is literally just another $99 Game Boy and they get triggered hard. They don't even really know their Nintendo history at all, they don't understand that Iwata's Nintendo for example was very different from Yamauchi's Nintendo and that Furukawa's Nintendo could also be completely different as well. It's just lazy analysis.
By the way the whole premise of the Switch being somehow some crap hardware that Nintendo chose is false by a data leak at Nintendo, from that data leak we know the original concept for NX used worse hardware with a 480p screen only (we have even have even leaked schematics) ... they opted against this and released a more powerful system, choosing at the time pretty much the top of the line mobile chip available to them.
Last edited by Soundwave - on 19 May 2024
