By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Qwark said:
Chrkeller said:

Not enough to off set performance gains.  The 4050 has art advantages over the 3090 and it means literally nothing.  The 3090 is a closer match to the 4090 than the 4050.  

So yeah, 100%.  Frankly that isn't my position, it is a cold hard fact.  

I would argue the 2070 super is still a better card than the 4050. Architecture gains are used for more power and sometimes smart features, which you can calculate in a lot of tests. If the card has less performance than another card in those tests it's worse.

The difference in architecture doesn't mean much of you do not utilise the power of those cards. Better upscaling with DLSS 3 does help the 4050 though. Although keeping it locked to the 40 series might also be a marketing strategy since FSR is a lot more backwards compatible.

100% agreed.  I would take a 2070s over a 4050 all day.  Newer chipsets don't mean what people think it does.  Pure processing power is more important.  The S2 will have a modern chipset but not the muscles to touch the ps5.  Hence the S2 will be closer to the ps4.  

But hey, spot on.  

Heck halo infinite runs better on the One X than the Series S.....  



i7-13700k

Vengeance 32 gb

RTX 4090 Ventus 3x E OC

Switch OLED