Chrkeller said:
Soundwave said:
I love how certain people don't question shit at all when it's Microsoft, Series S is a Series X hardware class, no questions asked, why because MS told them so, even if the performance differences in the two systems are quite large. But in that case if you dare compare a Series S to a PS4 Pro, they immediately go into a "well you can'T juSt cOmpARe To Ps4 PRO Doooood! That's Toutttallly different!!! Have to considERRR the FeatureSSET of Seeeeeeeeries SSSSSSS, not jusT teraFLops!!".
But that of course doesn't apply to the Switch 2, the modern feature set, which we know it will have (better than the Series S honestly, Nvidia has DLSS, AMD doesn't), then doesn't apply there. That only applies for the Series S, lol. All the double standards are hilarious.
They'll never make a stink and say the Series S is not comparable to the PS5/XSX, only for the Switch 2 do they feel threatened for whatever reason when it gets talked about in potentially a similar kind of way.
|
Lol, chill. You are taking everything personally.
I wouldn't touch the series s, it isn't a real xbox imo. Halo Infinite runs way better on the series x, large gap.
|
It really is a BS post cause many complained about Series s holding back current gen on other forums I visited. Second if Switch matches Series s then no one would complain that Is a amazing hardware for hybrid. Third this is not exclusive to switch there was rumors about ps5 being only 7 teraflops before official specs were released, and many were saying they would go back to Xbox or not buy a ps5 if it was much more powerful then the ps5.
