Chrkeller said:
Who is suggesting everyone needs a 4090? My personal preference is my own. I was simply stating even PC users are sticking with old hardware. And I get it, gpu prices are crazy. There is still a lot of 1000 and 2000 series in use. And I do think pricing was a big part of the switch's success. S2, if Nintendo is smart, should be $350 to $400. I think we are saying the same thing, market dynamics have shifted. Sony will need to adjust. Instead of a ps5 pro.... a ps5 series s. |
They don't, it's just the 4090 is the pinnacle of GPU greatness along with the pinnacle of GPU pricing insanity. All GPU's are priced much too high.
My point was simply stuff is too expensive right now, especially stuff nobody really needs but wants.
Depends on what hardware S2 has and how much profit Nin feels they need to make immediately, but going beyond $400 would be taking a huge risk.
PS5 Pro will be fine if it's only 2X performance improvement for $499 with base PS5 dropping to $399. If PS5 Pro is over $500, SNY won't be getting 4-1 or 5-1 sales and will get like 10-1 sales instead.
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.







