By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Soundwave said:
Chrkeller said:

Lol, not is isn't.  The ps5, from a nvidia perspective, is close to a 2070s.  Jesus, you don't know anything at all.  

A 2050 will run basically anything a PS5 will, it's like saying a XBox Series S is not the same class of hardware as a Series X. A 2050 is about half a PS5 in raw performance but has DLSS on top of that which means it doesn't have to run games at the same resolution to get a similar looking image. 

You guys are ridiculous if you're complaining about that level of hardware in a portable device, lol, that is like the nerdiest fringe of a fringe ("boo hoo! I can't play a game with no anistropic filtering!"). 

Jeezus, how did you live before 2015, lol. It reminds me of a time I was at the Apple store about a year ago and listening to a parent who had a 12 year old having a melt down saying they couldn't live their life if they were forced to use an iPhone 12, lol. Like if that was my kid they'd be getting a swift smack upside the head for being a dumb ass and reminded that even an iPhone 12 is a luxury. 

Portables being able to run modern console games at all is a freaking miracle, that wasn't a normal thing until like a few years ago, a RTX 2050-range portable machine is freaking incredible. In the hands of any developer that really wants to give half an effort, that can run basically any modern gen game like Alan Wake II at a reasonable fidelity that is very playable.

Lol, I'm not bothering with you.  You think a 50 and 70 are the same class of hardware, lmfao.  That says everything there is to say.  

That and you can't follow an argument.  Nobody is complaining about a 2050 switch 2.  Pointing out it isn't a 2070s isn't a complaint, just a hardcore undisputed fact.  

Last edited by Chrkeller - on 11 February 2024

i7-13700k

Vengeance 32 gb

RTX 4090 Ventus 3x E OC

Switch OLED