"Nintendo users only buy Nintendo games on Nintendo systems" How true was this?

[Chrkeller]

Mar1217 said:

Chrkeller said:

Indie type games are cheaper to develop and easier to port.  I'm was talking about big budget AAA games.  It doesn't make sense to focus on a console that will offer a small percent of sales.  Just economics.

Ok, so just say it, you wanna move the goalpost because third parties isn't just about  AAA games, even you yourself value them more, this has no bearing on the fact the Switch has enjoyed a success among Indies and AA 3rd party games that it's console competitors do not on the same level. 

As for the AAA perspective, it is partially right in it's own accord that playing most 3rd party games on the Switch is already difficult due to the increasingly old hardware architecture that demands to restructure those games to be available on the platform to begin with. Yet, speaking of % of sales for these AAA games, there's precedent for the Switch versions of these games to surpass easily the Xbox sales, what do we about these ? Do we just say these games should not be ported on Xbox for the same reason you cited for the Switch ?

Not at all.  I meant AAA in my post, I simply wasn't clear.  It was an honest omission that people are overreacting to.  I hate GTA and think Hades and Ori are some of the best games ever.  I'm currently playing Cocoon.  Oh and Tunic was super good too.  

So no, your take is wholly inaccurate.

Oh, and Triangle Strategy is the best square game in a decade.  

Porting indies is easier than AAA.  AAA on the switch, or lack of, makes sense.