Phil Spencer: "Nintendo future exists off their own hardware"

[zeldaring]

zero129 said:

SvennoJ said:

And there would be a place for XBox hardware as well if MS actually gave a damn about XBox. MS could have taken a giant leap ahead with VR tied to Kinect, full body tracking in VR. And while Series S feels like it's holding back the X, it's the perfect excuse to turn it into the most powerful handheld rivaling Steamdeck.

MS rather competes with Steam, game distribution instead of creation. And how does MS' future not exists off their own hardware, the Azure platform... MS rather keeps their hardware to themselves and wants you to pay for using it which has been their philosophy since introducing live gold.

Nintendo and Sony are still innovating, MS is turning into a reseller.

This is some of the most bullshit i have heard. What did Sony bring to gaming that Ms or Nintendo didnt already do?.

Nintendo Analog stick --> Sony Dual Analog sticks. Nintendo Rumble Pak --> Sony the dual shock,

MS Hard Drive --> Sony Hardrive. Ms proper online with friends list etc on a console -> Sony now the same thing.

Fuck lets go back to sega. Sega Cd Sony using CD's for the PS1. Clearly DVD was the next stage so what did Sony bring???.

Lol dual analogs were invotive as hell. Doesnt matter if Nintendo made the anlog they didn't make dual analogs. Might as well not give Nintendo credit cause we had joy sticks or the atari anglog stick in the 80s lol

Also ps2 is the first console to use USB ports.

 I also consider the 360 triggers to be innovative and the duel sense.