zorg1000 said:
Well first of all, MS doing anti-consumer things does not mean we should advocate for the rest of the industry to follow suit. Second of all, you think “thinking ahead” consists of paying for games from the 80s & 90s? You think they would make more but why exactly? How much is Nintendo willing to spend on these games and how much do these companies currently make from these games? And how does Nintendo benefit from this? How many people who don’t already own a Switch and subscribe to NSO are going to do so for these games? Bigger franchises like Mega Man, Final Fantasy, Castlevania & Mega Man can remain multiplatform? So you mean the retro games that people actually care about from these companies and the only exclusives are the niche games that nobody cares about anymore? That seems to completely destroy the entire premise and makes me think you didn’t put a whole lot of thought into this. |
It wouldnt be niche games. Have you seen the backlog of these companies? Hundreds of great games.
Not sure what you mean about paying to play older games are somehow not acceptable? Thats what we are doing now. Why would they suddenly become free?
And yes, I didnt put that much thought into it. I just thought it would be a great conversation piece
If Nintendo get like 30 million subsribers, that would mean 150-300M a year for each company. I somehow doubt anyone makes that much off their older games.