By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 said:
zeldaring said:

Lol how am I moving goal posts when that's what you're doing. My only point is you said Nintendo takes risks and I explained why they did. Then you changed the subject about innovation.

Anyway where is the DF thread aren't you fascinated by how games run on ancient hardware for some reason lol.

My first post explicitly cited innovation, there is no subject change.

You claimed Nintendo only innovate when they're failing. I pointed out why you're wrong with multiple specific examples. You then moved the goalposts to "but Sony innovates sometimes too".

I never said Nintendo only innovates when they  fail. I said take risk and new direction is something they had to do after they failed. As you said Nintendo keeps things interesting by taking risk and innovation, we can all agree the 3 consoles manufactures all share this. so the main reason Nintendo really keeps things interesting is because they took a totally different direction with after GC failure.