By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
burninmylight said:
Cobretti2 said:

I reckon I passed on about 50 games and collections because of the second point.

Everyone keeps talking about DLSS possibly putting the Switch 2 in the same ballpark with the PS5 and X Series in terms of being able to get ports from those consoles, but I keep thinking that where we will really see it being used is to alleviate situations like Point 2.

Like, if the Arkham collection were to come to Switch 2, instead of using DLSS to make it look nearly on par with PS5/XS versions of games and run north of 1080p and 60 fps, I could see publishers instead locking those games to 1080p so they could use even lower quality textures and assets on the card to save space and fit more games on it. Then they can say, "Look, no more code in a box! It's all here, just like you asked!!!"

And to be honest, I'd be cool with that. It will be a long time before I will own a TV that would allow me to see the difference that 4K output can produce, and 1080p still looks perfectly fine to me. Heck, 480p widescreen looks fine to me. I'd rather not need to constantly spend more money on storage just to be able to spend more money on games than to have prettier games that require me to figure out how I can afford them.

Absolutely agree.  Not only to save space on the cartridges but also because high quality textures will need memory speeds I don't think the switch 2 will have.

Switch 2 will be a ps4/one, which is great and will be a massive improvement.

And you are absolutely right about panel quality being required for high end hardware.

Last edited by Chrkeller - on 14 September 2023

i7-13700k

Vengeance 32 gb

RTX 4090 Ventus 3x E OC

Switch OLED