By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
zorg1000 said:
Chrkeller said:

I'll let the expert digital foundry folks know you don't agree with their in depth technical analysis.  

And continue to ignore the 60 fps performance option.  Have a good weekend.

But without having a professional give you a frame by frame technical analysis would you notice major differences between PS4 & PS5 versions of games like Miles Morales,  Ragnarok or FF7? Or would it feel like subtle differences?

Performance mode, significant and massive improvement.  60 fps is awesome and not remotely subtle IMHO.  I've played FF7 on the pro and again on the ps5.  Absolutely 60 fps is a massive improvement.

I would greatly prefer Nintendo, with the switch 2, to use power for 60 fps and not go after RT.

And the ps5 games that support 120 hz....  amazing.  Anybody who thinks the ps5 isn't a massive jump over the ps4 needs to play Rift in performance at 120 hz.

Now if people dont care that is fine, people deserve respect for their opinions.  But arguing Ragnarok at 60 fps at 120 hz isn't a significant jump are being absurd. 

The gap between the ps4 and ps5 isn't small.

Last edited by Chrkeller - on 08 September 2023

i7-13700k

Vengeance 32 gb

RTX 4090 Ventus 3x E OC

Switch OLED