-Adonis- said:
I can see that you are triggered.
Imagine loving a brand that much that you don't accept that people say it's very old tech... And I doubt that Nintendo's next console will incorporate DLSS 3, a technology only available on 40XX graphics cards. DLSS 1 is bad tech. So come back to Earth. |
Sounds like you're the one triggered, everyone knows DLSS is Nvidia proprietary tech that likely will be part of the next Switch. Also funny how you conveniently skip over DLSS 2.0+ which is fine and does everything I've said, it can take a 360p image and make it look like 720p or better, you don't need DLSS 3.0 for that.
I'm guessing you knew that, which is why you chicken shitted out of mentioning DLSS 2.0+.
The other thing is at the end of the day FF16 doesn't even look that great. It certainly does not look like a real generational leap over FF7 Remake. Looks to me like their "graphics budget" is hitting up against a roof for practical and money reasons. I wouldn't be holding my breath for a FF17 that looks leaps and bounds better than 16 or 7 Remake frankly.
So the whole "I don't want Final Fantasy on lesser hardware!" reasoning I think is bullshit too, FF games are going to hit a roof if they haven't already of how much budget Square-Enix can put into any one game given the returns which seem to be declining. Series is becoming a sub-million seller in Japan which is just sad when it used to sell 3+ million there, and in the US they can do all the fancy Game of Thrones crap they want, it's never going to be a big US centric series the way things like GTA or Red Dead or COD or something like that are there. They've shot themselves in the foot by not building and maintaining the sizable audience they had in Japan by sticking with Sony's declining hardware lines there. You're not going to outspend Western studios that are looking at 20-30 million in sales for their game and being top of the line in graphics, again it's not 2004 anymore, Square-Enix.
Last edited by Soundwave - on 09 July 2023
