javi741 said:
Nintendo shouldn't risk pricing their system more expensive just for more power to get 3rd party support. A vast majority of Switch owners purchase a Switch solely for Nintendo games, and 3rd party games are just looked as a supplement but never the main intent on why people purchase the Switch. Plus, the current Switch is super underpowered and if we're being real most of the 3rd party support on Switch has been rereleases of older games or indie titles. There aren't many current gen ports on Switch but it's still far from hurting Switch sales. Switch is missing pretty huge current gen franchises like Call of Duty, GTA 5, Madden,Resident Evil, other big games like Elden Ring and more and it still isn't hurting the Switch. Even if the Switch 2 was underpowered as well, it'll still get the older 3rd party games and missing out on some current gen franchises won't hurt the Switch 2. Most people would rather pay cheaper just to play Nintendo games. |
The pool of people willing to pay for a system only to play Nintendo games is not as big as you think. Switch would never be close selling 150 million with Nintendo games only. Not being able to play even the PS4/Xbone games would lead to major deficit in software side. Enough to make Switch 2 flops? No, but 60-65% of Switch lifetimes sales is likely to be the roof for such device
In other hand raising 50 or even 100 USD is not going to hurt Nintendo in any way. If people bought OLED and its ancient chipseat for 350 USD, 400 USD in a new machine is totally doable