US Politics |OT|

[Machiavellian]

Mandalore76 said:

Machiavellian said:

Is this like the whole "Lock her up" where people who support Trump use such terms like "Trump Derangement Syndrome" to blindly not read any particular post or even understand the context of what is being discussed.

So I will just address my statement which has nothing to do with Trump and everything to do with the GOP party in general.  It doesn't matter if it Trump, Regan or some fictional character in the future, as a party, its not in the party best interest to allow a GOP president to go to jail for whatever reason, unless that person can be made a maryter.

You do know there are 3 cases against Trump, the one you listed is probably the least of them since its about using campaign money that he did not report to pay someone to keep their mouth shut.  If anything it, would be some fine so no one is looking at that case as something that would put him in jail. Its like the whole federal documents case, it was Trump who pretty much put himself in this legal pradicament and it appears people like you are more willing to ignore his own stupidiy and gloss over it then accept that he is in the situation he is in from bad decisions. Now whether there is enough evidence to put in him jail is a totally different subject which we are not close to discussing because we don't know enough yet.

Even your whole speculation post doesn't mean jack until we actually see charges

Yes, of course I am aware of the other cases against Trump.  That's why I specifically stated "this is actually the weakest case against Trump for him to be indicted on.  Which may only ultimately strengthen his later defenses of being the victim of a political witch-hunt" in the very first sentence of my post.  Fantastic that my post "doesn't mean jack" until the charges, but everyone here is free to bash the imagined mentality of not just Trump supporters, but Republican voters and conservatives in general.  I made very specific points about the likelihood of conviction in a very specific case.  Not sure how that gets twisted into my somehow being a Trump apologist.  Yep, attack and completely disregard the source regardless of whether the points made in the article, or the fact that cite recent historical precedent, have any merit to the discussion.  

Your post doesn't mean jack because no one is talking about what you are making a statement on.  You saw the word Trump and just jump to conclusion.  You started that conclusion by calling everyone "TDS" and then went off on a tangent no one cared about because no charges actually was made against Trump.  Then you posted someone opinion on some hypothetical charges from someone whose has been shone to be pretty bias.  So the topic really isn't about Trump the context was about the GOP party.  Actually, I do not believe anyone really cares about Trump, I know I do not.  I believe he is a dead man walking as he has accumulated way to much baggage like Hillary Clinton.  Maybe he will be able to pull another rabbit out of his hat but it will be interesting come primary time.  He uses the same tactics as before and I just doubt anyone is going to receptive to it this time.