| Ryuu96 said: We should add Elite Dangerous to the comparison too since it's set in space It feels weird to see how hard they're being compared, Star Citizen is a Multiplayer Space Trading/Combat Simulation, No Mans Sky is a Survival title with Multiplayer elements, Starfield is a Single Player ARPG. These titles may share some similar themes (they're set in space) and do have a few similar mechanics (resource gathering) although many games share stuff with each other, at the end of the day, they won't feel nothing alike in gameplay, story, tone or even art style. Nothing quite feels like a Bethesda ARPG. Edit - Just to add, comparisons are fine but to imply they're basically the same game is weird, Lol. I don't think they look the same Tbh but if I had to, I'd say Starfield looks more like Star Citizen than No Mans Sky (because there's a gigantic art-style, story, gameplay difference) but at the end of the day they absolutely will not feel like each other at all. |
Couldnt agree more. They will be different games to eachother but everytime i hear or read that Star Field is like No Man Sky i have to facepalm.
As you stated that Star Field is a ARPG which speaks more volume than watching a video of NMS and SF comparison.
