By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
eva01beserk said:
Azzanation said:

You literally think that SF looks more like NMS than SC? 

NMS gameplay loop is similar to Subnautica where as SF is like OuterWorlds.

Also SC was doing NMS before NMS. Its inspiration evolves from FreeLancer to Star Citizen which was in development 1 year before NMS release and now we have Star Field from Bethesda.

It's literaly the same game you would get 6 years later with a bigger budget. 

Never played subnautica. But we have no gameplay loop at all from starfield. Tod said our job us explorering just like no mans sky.

It can start production a decade before it still acomplished nothing but scam millions out of fans. No mans sky released crappy years ago and improved a hell of a lot and you actually got a full game now. So I don't know why you are so down on a game that made a great turn around and is enjoyed by many. But keep praising a official scam. Because of its graphics?

No its not.

You understand what genre NMS is right? You understand StarField is basically Fallout in space correct? Fallout is nothing like NMS.

Just because you can build bases and travel planet to planet doesn't mean its the exact same game lol ffs.

I have nothing against NMS, its evolve to be a good game however showing clips of things you can do in NMS and comparing them to SF is misleading. StarField is an RPG. The gameplay, combat, objectives, hand crafted worlds, NPCs and Lore etc are all completely different to what NMS offers where as Star Citizen offers similar attributes and Gameplay. 

Star Citizen being a scam has zero to do with the point being made. The demo exists, the website and community exists. You can play it right now if you have a decent PC.

If anything, NMS is a poor mans Star Citizen while Star Field seems to fit in between them both.

Last edited by Azzanation - on 14 June 2022