| pokoko said: I'm not a fan of celebrities and it's not like I know all that much about this but I have been absolutely stunned at the number of media outlets that have been firmly on the side of Amber Heard. I mean, of the two, she is the one that is an ADMITTED abuser. At the very least, condemn them both, but to circle the wagons around someone who is undoubtedly abusive? |
I have seem articles on the type of "After everything we saw in the trial how can anyone still support Jhonny Depp", or "The destruction of Amber through the trial shows how sexist our society is" or "Ambers case shows Black Women will be steamrolled when trying to denounce abuse against them" and other very moronic stances that are exclusively because she is a female. Not only ignore that the trial was based on she making false claims and damaging the ex-partner (this is the part the articles I mentioned do) but also ignoring that she indeed physically and verbally assault him and that her testimonies confirmed as well as her (this part even more neutral or even to the other side of the spectrum haven't touched much). As you said, was it reversed JD would have suffered lynching, well he already suffered a lot even when it was one sided claim without proof imagine after a trial with evidences show.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







