By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
cyberninja45 said:
sundin13 said:

Well:

A) That's a shitty way to debate

B) If you are looking for a perfect study to fix the exact question you are looking for then sorry bud, you ain't gonna find it. Science doesn't work like Rule 34. You essentially build the house of your argument out of the information you have available. In this case, we can get pretty close to your questions at hand, but alas, it isn't quite possible to fit it perfectly. Like, the block fits in the hole, but there is a bit of wiggle room. It provides us a reasonable assumption regarding your question and I see no reason why that shouldn't be considered good enough here. 

Well you gonna have to very precise and questions directly answered if you gonna persuade people to give up basic rights.

So you're just planning on endlessly stonewalling while kids die because your hyper-specific questions don't have perfect answers?

Cool.

Cool.

When do we start to acknowledge the basic rights of our kids to not get fucking murdered in their schools?