padib said:
You mentioned that it's the horn of a leapordbear lion, I shared scripture that makes it clear that it's a person that people will follow, and who's resurrection will astonish people. More than citing the text to show you that what I'm saying is true to the text, I can't offer. The best I can do is point you to Matthew 24, Mark 13 and Luke 21. |
Again, you believe it to make clear that it is a person, because it fits best in modern contexts by your personal estimation. It is not made clear by the scripture, as the scripture intentionally makes very little clear.
However, I will say this in regards to your interpretations. If science allows individuals to be brought back from the dead, why would this bestow any theological significance on any individual? That is to say, why would people be astounded and follow such a man, when his resurrection was the product of science? That would be like following the first man who had received a heart transplant as if he had done anything. It would make far more sense to deify the doctor or scientist in such a scenario. As such, I see little logic in your interpretation that this will be a byproduct of scientific advancements.