scrapking said:
I actually agree with not having a system in-between "S" and "X". For most people I think a Series S is 80% of the experience of the Series X, especially when viewed across the room, and especially on a less than huge TV. But the rumours are the rumours, so I approached them as I heard them. :) |
I do to, but it depends on what was being asked based on what MS and its customers want. If they're saying seems like they may want more performance overall in the XBSS, then adding a $400 SKU makes sense. If they don't care about performance much, then ya, price reduction is definitely priority.
With the chip shortage making it unlikely price drops will come anytime soon, then best bet when it comes to the clear storage concern, is bundle more storage however MS wants to do it. There's plenty of ways they could, but the most important would be to keep the cost below $400 because a direct price comparison with PS5 DE wouldn't play out well for an XBSS storage bundle. An XBSS + 512GB EXP SSD bundle for $379 would be intriguing for example.
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.







