By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
padib said:
CaptainExplosion said:

In other words, Nintendo's just being arrogant and greedy. That's why people have been tweeting #DontPaySwitchOnline.

He's not talking about the expansion, he's talking about Nintendo Online, Xbox live Gold, PSN.

 Nothing greedy about those they are providing a service.

What is greedy is making us pay while providing poor service.

You are already paying for the service when you buy the console and then when you buy the game. You may be fine with paying for online, but I`ll hold it is greedy.

I also completely understand Sony justification for rasing the price for PS5 with inflation and increased development cost, plus customers accepting it, but it is still greedy.

How can you say Nintendo needs to charge for online to keep the costs of the server when we just had someone saying he paid over 200 USD to have Smash plus all DLCs. That is obscenelly high (with DLC costing pennies to make compared with their price), and won`t even enter the area of keeping the full price for a whole gen.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."