Chrkeller said:
Yep. PSN in particularly bothers me, because souls is my 2nd favorite franchise and I like just jumping online randomly, but hate having to pay for it. Really I just don't play online via souls as much as I would like because I refuse to pay for PSN. Online should be free for low volume online gamers such as myself, but it will never happen. Nintendo charging for subscription doesn't bother me, because of the VC titles I have on other systems. I'm just thankful I already own the games. Subscriptions aren't my thing, though it is the future. Only a matter of time before new AAA releases are subscriptions. |
Totally agree with you.
PS+ for me I sub because of the collection of games gave during the year plus the step discount for little older games... right now I`m at 12 PS5, 195 PS4 free games on PSN, plus over another 200 that I either bought or were gifted by Sony. But I haven`t touched the Multiplayers on it.
So yes, something like Gamepass is nice service (even though I don`t like the type of direction that can lead), but at least it works similar to a rental, you pay per month and can pick and use whatever is available. Paying for online or to much for old titles (I do like those 30 titles collection on a midia though) is bad for me.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







