mjk45 said:
Why make a thread about it then?, the article itself had plenty of replies that addressed the article and it's shortcomings including yours and while I agree with your overall view and find fault in authors reasonings I noticed the reply was done in a very personalised manner and here we have GoOnKid starting off by saying" your article was biased "as if that's a valid form of critique and couldn't be seen as an attack on someone's integrity. |
Well, I thought it wasn't necessary to repeat all the shortcomings so by saying "your article was biased" I thought I'd just summarize what everyone else had already said. But I can see your point, that sentence wasn't needed, I admit.
