Kwaidd said: I'd be willing to sell my day 1 Switch and pay the diff for this one, even though I only play docked and have no broadband and there doesn't appear to be any internal hardware upgrades. Color is sweet, imo |
Well, technically you do get more internal memory.
ZyroXZ2 said: If someone already said this, I apologize for not reading all 20 pages, but I recently tweeted this and wanted to say it here, too: Wait, are Nintendo apologists proud of NOT expecting a more powerful Switch? Is your bar set so low that you expect virtually nothing and think that's a WIN?! |
Nintendo hasn't been about playing the graphics arms race in three generations, why would they start now? I am quite content with the power of my base Switch so I feel no need nor expectation for a midgen power upgrade.
IcaroRibeiro said: OLED could easily be 300 USD and standard and Lite be lowered in price |
Why on earth would any company in their right mind lower the price of a system that they can't even keep up with the demand for?
Norion said: Some responses I've seen do confuse me since I don't get being glad this isn't more powerful or chastising people feeling disappointed. Considering how poorly certain Switch games run not having to wait a minimum another two years to play them with resolution and/or frame rates that aren't bad would've been really nice for a lot of people. |
Well, just personally, the reason I'm glad it's not a power upgrade is because I don't want devs having to optimize for more configurations or targeting the Pro model to mean that games are worse optimized for the base Switch I own, or just skip the base model altogether.