By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Jumpin said:
mjk45 said:

No they are doing what sites have always done and that is post unverifiable info, and minimise the rumour component by writing it up like it's a fait accompli. 

Considering the significant unlikelihood that there’s a conspiracy impacting the sources - that Nintendo lied to devs and people in the know, or that the people familiar with the matter and developers all conspired to fool Bloomberg - there really is only two options for the accuracy or inaccuracy of the report: Bloomberg is lying or they aren’t.

We seen this before where leaked sources have been wrong and also the opposite it's why they are called rumours, now if someone doesn't believe a certain leak with no verifiable source doesn't mean they are accusing the publisher of lying,and this is because it was stated as a rumour and not fact, so what you would be doing is making a judgment based on how you perceive the strength of the rumour nothing more , to accuse them of lying you would need to go further than just not believing that rumour. 



Research shows Video games  help make you smarter, so why am I an idiot