Pemalite said:
Vodacixi said:
None. I never put in doubt what your thoughts about the technical aspects of the port were. Look, this is getting very old by now, so let's wrap this up:
- You said the switch was the worst way to play the game without getting into specifics..
|
I got into specifics and elaborated on where it falls short on the technical aspects.
Vodacixi said:
- You reasserted your point by repeting the sentence "the Switch is the worst way to play the game" and then proceeded to show me some portable PCs and telling me that gyro controls are in other platforms as well. By doing this, you made pretty clear that your initial affirmation wasn't just about the technical aspects of the port.
|
From a technical aspect it is the worst way to play the game.
It has the worst graphics and performance.
Vodacixi said:
- I said (again) that I was refering specially to other videogame consoles (consoles in the platform sense, like Playstation or Xbox) when I talked about gyro controls and portability. Since PS4/PS5 and Xbox One/Series X are platforms were you can play the game and these dont have said features, saying that the Switch is the worst way to play it is, in my opinion, an inaccurate statement.
|
If you feel that Gyro controls justifies your purchase of the game on Switch, then that justifys your purchase. Really no skin off my nose and it's not a bad purchase.
Not sure how many times I can say it's a good port.
Keyboard and Mouse is definitely a more accurate and faster control scheme for twitch first person shooters.
Vodacixi said:
- And then, in the end, after all the discussion, you said "lol, I was talking about the technical aspects". When you clearly weren't.
|
That is your false interpretation.
If we go back to my opening post I quote myself:
"If you don't care about framerates and visuals and wish to play it in portable mode, you really can't go wrong unless you get a handheld PC or use xcloud."
Clearly I was talking about it's technical merits.
You are just trying to create an argument where there isn't one.
Vodacixi said:
My only problem with you was that you were clearly talking about a certain thing, but then decided to say that you didn't. And I don't like that. That's all. And I don't want to keep talking about this. It has turned into a very stupid conversation by now and I have better things to do. Bye.
|
Whatever issue you have with me as a person is irrelevant to the discussion and whatever issue you have with my postys? Well, apologies, but I ultimately don't care.
I don't take issue with users, I debate the points presented.
|
Good Lord... C'mon, one more time. Third one is the charm.
You didn't get into specifics AT ALL in your first statment. After saying that "it's the worst way to play the game" you said that if people didn't care about performance and graphics, it was a good option. But that's not the same as specifying that you were only talking about technical aspects. That's why you engaged in an argument with me about portable PCs also having gyro controls and portability (despite me specifying that those advantages were mostly on the console competition) despite in your own words not being interested in discussing those aspects, and that's why four people agreed with me when I called you out on your first statement. Clearly, I wasn't the only one that thought you were speaking in general. Since I'm not alone on this, maybe, just MAYBE you should consider the possibility that you didn't explain yourself properly... or that you are flat out lying to me for whathever reason.
If all you are going to do is keep repeating like a parrot that you were talking about technical matters all the time without truly adressing the incoherences that statement has... then please, don't. Just don't say anything else. If that's the case, you win, ok? You explained yourself perfectly from the beginning, you never changed your mind mid-argument and no one besides me misunderstood you. You did everything great. Have a good night.
