By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 said:
shikamaru317 said:

While it is true that Star Trek has always been progressive; the socialist Utopia of the United Federation of Planets, the long history of minority representation, the first onscreen interracial kiss in TOS, the first on-screen female-female kiss in DS9; from what I've seen these latest shows from CBS have taken things to all new extremes. I'm told the Social Justice agenda of Discovery in particular doesn't feel natural at all, but rather quite ham-fisted and in-your-face. Compare Discovery's social justice agenda to The Orville's, most classic Star Trek fans enjoy The Orville and are ok with the whole male-male Bortus-Klyden relationship and the subtle trans rights message of Moclan society in general. On the other hand most classic Star Trek fans seem to hate the social justice agenda of Discovery from what I've seen. 

I know personally, as a right wing Star Trek fan, I never really found any of the social justice agenda in TOS through ENT offensive, with only a handful of exceptions like the episode of ENT where Phlox decided not to help save an entire species from extinction because there was an oppressed minority species on the same planet whose evolutionary course was being held back by the dominant species (known to be the most controversial ENT episode, the producers, writers, and Phlox actor received many angry letters and saw many angry forum posts from fans about that episode). However, some of the clips I've seen of Discovery and it's agenda are just pure cringe to me. 

While Discovery can definitley be a little cringey at times, for me that comes from jokes that don't quite land or attempts to be quirky, I didn't find it any more politically overt than previous series of Star Trek.

And yeah that episode of Enterprise didn't sit right with me either, letting a whole sentient species die while a cure is on hand. Came across as very morally questionable.

I am not even sure why this is up for debate. The original Star Trek is easily the most socially progressive TV show in history. The guy above is upset that the newer shows take things to new extremes, while the original show took things to old extremes. That's a fairly consistent use of the license, that means the recent ones are operating within the spirit of Star Trek. He thinks the new stuff is unnatural while the older Star Trek is natural, this is simply because society has advanced. Similarly, much of what feels unnatural to conservatives today is going to be natural to conservatives 50 years from now.



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.