VideoGameAccountant said:
Nintendo would still have to pay their creditors. It wasn't a massive amount of money but it was still quite a lot for not that much gain. At the same time, they probably weren't going to keep the Mario and Luigi games going since they were doing poorly after Dream Team. It would make more sense to absorb the employees and put them working on Mario projects (as they are familiar with the IP). |
I do agree. My point was just that sometimes it can be worth to buy a company in debt, you can pay almost nothing to owners and just have to pay debts (and sure that will always depend on how much debt and potential profit in the future there is).

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







