IvorEvilen said:
Ya know what, I'll step out of the shadows for this one. This is a real subtle way of implying that states with smaller populations are smarter/ more educated than the more populous states. I guess me as a Californian is 3.6x dumber than someone from Wyoming. And don't even get me started on those Puerto Ricans. Clearly the 3.2 million of them are all too stupid to be able to have a say in who the next president is. /sarcasm You have no idea how INFURIATING it is to live in a COUNTY that has a larger population than 43 states, but only represents 1/4 of the votes for 2 senators. California has 1/9 the population of the US, and should represent 1/9 of the government. Under the circumstances, we are ignored, or at worst, we face political retaliation. For example, Republicans know they'll never win any statewide elections, and since the popular vote does not matter, they have no intention to court voters here. The Trump administration has repeatedly retaliated against my state and it has made it more blue. But that doesn't matter to them. The Electoral College is about disenfranchisement. Places with less people are given more say in governance, which flies in direct contradiction to the saying: |
California does represent 1/9 of the government. In the US House of Representatives. Senators are sent to the Senate to represent the interests of the states. All states are equal in the eyes of the Constitution. Hence, 2 senators per state. State populations are not equal in the eyes of the state. Hence, the US House.