PDF said:
I simply disagree, If you have news that will end the competitor's positive press you don't hold it back. Sony has an okay price but not one that would have ended the news of a $299 next-gen console. You don't have to agree with the value breakdown of PS5 SKUs vs the Xbox SKUs, the fact is that Xbox has the cheapest entry point for next-gen consoles by $100. Some reports that Sony slashed the PS5 price after Series X reveal. You can believe that or not. https://www.gamereactor.eu/source-playstation-5-to-adjust-plans-in-response-xbox-series-x-pricing/ |
The always trustworthy "anonymous" source, one also said PS5 production was cut from 16M to 11M and price would be 449. And that was published on Bloomberg that is more trustworthy than gamereactor... so if I was going to play the same game as you I would say Sony was so happy with MS price that they increased their price by 50 bucks.
Even after the rebuttal by Sony people still clanged to it with the famous "Sony wouldn't confirm even if it was true".

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







