vivster on 15 September 2020
| DonFerrari said: This could mean Nintendo is locked to a single supplier so that supplier have more power against them, or Nintendo becomes more relevant customer since the total expenditure on that supplier will increase. Anything outside of that I wouldn't put much weight into. |
Wrong. Nintendo has absolutely no dealings with ARM. They have only ever been a customer to Nvidia who created and manufacturwd the chip after they licensed the design from ARM. The only thing that happens through that deal is that Nvidia now has to pay less for ARM designs.
If you purchase an apple in the supermarket then you don't suddenly have a contract with the orchard. That also doesn't change if the supermarket buys the orchard.
If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.
