padib said:
Not true. There were already families of devices from a long time ago GBA SP, game boy color, DS lite, etc. No he was talking about something else, more like the New 3DS in your example, which is not just a change in form factor, but a change in hardware capabilities. The Apple line was cited because it offers jumps in hardware without causing incompatibilities with the current model. That's the main difference. |
New 3DS wasn't a soft successor though, it was a hardware revision, similar to DSi. That's most likely what we will see with Switch; multiple revisions forming a single family but with a definitive next-gen successor in a few years time rather than iterative smartphone-type soft successors every couple of years.