Nobody here is sourcing science papers, so why should I?
It's always like this:
Paper says scientist said the world will end - See see, the world will end.
The world didn't end - That was just the paper interpretation of the scientist. No science's fault.
This is nonsense.
I mean, if you don't want to do the work to have an informed opinion, that is entirely on you, however it should be understood by everyone involved that what you are saying is merely an uninformed opinion and, again, not an accurate reflection of scientific consensus. To that effect, I'm not really sure why it matters what others in this thread are doing. Just because some people in this thread may not be making the best arguments, that doesn't mean that there is any issue with the science...
Lastly, why do you think fringe opinions invalidate scientific consensus?