Grade the PS5 Conference

[Runa216]

TheMisterManGuy said:

Runa216 said:

I'm sorry, I actually have a life. The amount of time it would take to actually pinpoint everything you said that's misleading, wrong, or unethical and counterbalance it with corrections and explanations should cost you money. Plus, when you're so wrong your points disprove themselves by sheer volume of absurdity...well...

In other words, you don't actually have an argument. That's fine, but if you're going to say that my points are wrong or unethical, then at least explain why. Making broad generalizations without actually backing them up is just like saying "everyone who disagrees with me is a Nazi". 

I've had it with people who act like two sides of an issue have equal merit. In instances like this, there is a right answer and a wrong answer. Twintail and others are right. you are wrong. Stop moving the goalposts every time someone points out flaws in your logic. Stop being overly critical of non-majority representations. 

I'm speaking from the perspective of a writer myself. Saying I'm wrong or I'm moving goalposts isn't an argument if you can't back it up. If you actually want to find fault in my arguments, then you can actually try and address them. I'm not aiming to win, I'm aiming to come to an understanding. 

Stop acting like this is a big deal when it really, REALLY shouldn't be. 

I never acted like this was a big deal. You're just projecting. 

Oh, I have many, many arguments. Good ones. Great ones, even. What I don't have is the time to go into the level of detail needed to explain WHY they're good arguments. Furthermore, I don't believe for a second based on what you've written that you'll even consider the reality that I'm right and you're wrong. It literally doesn't matter what I say, you won't concede or even consider the possibility that you're wrong, your points are based off nonsense, and your stance is misguided at best and outright damaging at worst. 

I have arguments, but laying them out in a concise, timely manner is not worth my time because I don't believe you possess the capacity to even consider a single thing I say. Literally everything I say will be met with you simply using it as a prompt to push another faulty agenda or incite another bit of logical fallacy so you can feel alive by arguing. 

Inclusion shouldn't be seen as an act of politics, it should be normalized. you disagree. your fundamental stance on the issue is one of subjugation and prejudice. Until you get out of that hole, we cannot have a decent conversation on the matter. 

Stop trying to get a 'debate' out of me. All you're interested in is trolling me for responses to fuel your desire to argue a point; you have no interest in doing what's right or finding the truth. This never is or was about inclusion, it was always a political platform to cry about being repressed or underrepresented because gay characters went from 0.003% representation in the media and are like 2% now...which certain groups see as overrepresentation. This is because Females went from 5% to 8%. To some people, it's just an SJW agenda, and people who believe that cannot be argued with. I have no interest in engaging with you further, because I already know you're just going to say 'nuh uh!' and think up a million reasons why I'm wrong about you becuase that's not how you see yourself. 

Well, nobody likes admitting that they're wrong, and being proven wrong just turns us into pariahs in our own heads. that's you right now. a self-proclaimed pariah fighting for what YOU Want to be equality but isn't equality at all.