| Runa216 said: I'm sorry, I actually have a life. The amount of time it would take to actually pinpoint everything you said that's misleading, wrong, or unethical and counterbalance it with corrections and explanations should cost you money. Plus, when you're so wrong your points disprove themselves by sheer volume of absurdity...well... |
In other words, you don't actually have an argument. That's fine, but if you're going to say that my points are wrong or unethical, then at least explain why. Making broad generalizations without actually backing them up is just like saying "everyone who disagrees with me is a Nazi".
|
I've had it with people who act like two sides of an issue have equal merit. In instances like this, there is a right answer and a wrong answer. Twintail and others are right. you are wrong. Stop moving the goalposts every time someone points out flaws in your logic. Stop being overly critical of non-majority representations. |
I'm speaking from the perspective of a writer myself. Saying I'm wrong or I'm moving goalposts isn't an argument if you can't back it up. If you actually want to find fault in my arguments, then you can actually try and address them. I'm not aiming to win, I'm aiming to come to an understanding.
| Stop acting like this is a big deal when it really, REALLY shouldn't be. |
I never acted like this was a big deal. You're just projecting.
