By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 15 June 2020
Edit Thread
Mandalore76 said:
JapaneseGamesLover said:

Consumer is always satisfied with a playstation, due to huge library and 3rd party commitment.

PS1,PS2,PS3,PS4. PS5 wont be a an exception, paying even 600$ for a PS5 is totally in favour of the customer, when the competition is selling a cheaper system without enough good videogames to play. Sony is thinking about the customer experience, thats why they are never wrong since 1994. PS5 will re-confirm this.

Consumers vote with their wallets.  PS3's best sales years came after a number of price cuts.

This post contradicts your previous.

Xbox One corrected their price in the first year, the other faults were corrected before launch, the only fault they kept for the whole gen was lack of strong first party titles.

So although price is important we can't say that MS took to long to correct it.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."