JWeinCom said:
I don't think that's an apt analogy. With the concept of generations we're not talking about a principle. We're simply talking about categorization. Whether we call the Switch an 8th generation console, a 9th generation console, or abandon the concept altogether, it doesn't change anything about how gaming actually works. Whatever generation we consider the Switch should have no bearing on how we predict the gaming market will play out. What is objective is that the Switch launched several years after the PS4 and XBox One and its processing capabilities are not on par with them. Those underlying facts really don't change based on what generation you consider the Switch to be. On the other hand, people were actually under a grave misunderstanding of the facts when it came to the housing markets. |
If I'm hearing you right, it sounds like you never really believed in console generations to begin with. Perhaps that is the disagreement?
I tend to think generations are more than a categorization. They actually help describe sales behavior. The Genesis launched in the US around the height of the NES's popularity. It didn't affect NES sales at all. But the Genesis had a huge impact on SNES sales. The concept of generations is what explains this phenomenon.
curl-6 bet me that PS5 + X|S sales would reach 56m before year end 2023 and he was right.
My Bet With curl-6
My Threads:
Master Thread, Game of the Year/Decade
Switch Will Be #1 All Time
Zelda Will Outsell Mario (Achieved)
How Much Will MH Rise sell?
My Bet With Metallox







