RolStoppable said:
That type of argument didn't hold water three years ago and that hasn't changed. A home console/handheld console hybrid has to be portable by definition, so Switch being portable doesn't mean that it's just a handheld. If Switch had the size of even just the Wii (a small home console), it would already be laughably big for something that is supposed to be portable. What sets a hybrid console apart from a handheld that connects to the TV is its functionality, and like I said in my previous response, Nintendo didn't have to make any concessions to their home console experience for Switch. Your question is pointless because Nintendo stayed in both markets. |
Not really even though I didn't say it isn't hybrid, well but nintendo decided to make lite anyway and very little changed due to it.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







