Sony DMCA's themselves on Twitter

[Immersiveunreality]

SpokenTruth said:

Immersiveunreality said:

1) your own sentence is the example,what i said is a reaction to your sentence."Any photos or videos published for marketing purposes falls under Fair Use for they are published materials."I know you claim it is not a generalization but it is one made about ALL published materials for marketing purposes so it clearly is one,it is strange you try to deny such a clear fact.

2) That is why i tell you that you are wrong calling all things published fair use,because they do not lose copyright and if they do not lose copyright it is a big generalization claiming everything published for marketing is fair use.

That is what the law is and not my moral opinion.

1). I mean show an example of how an IP holder is using their marketing material that makes some fair use and some not fair use.

2). Anything published is open to Fair Use by another party provided they stay within the confines of Fair Use policy. See Point 1) above where I'm asking you what published marketing materials are not open to Fair Use.

Any use of pictures and videos that can bring down the marketworth of said product by unrightly transforming it in something it isnt can be considered as not being fair use like videos atm ''proving'' there is an SJW agenda behind the production of The last of us.Those kind of videos could by law be considered as not being fair use.

Bolded: That is what was missing from the generalisation you first made,adding onto it now is besides the argumentation but if that is what you think about it then that should be correct yes.

This is an example that could be considered as not being fair use:

But it does not mean all vids like these will be brought down,they just CAN if the ip owner wants.