Sony DMCA's themselves on Twitter

[Immersiveunreality]

SpokenTruth said:

Immersiveunreality said:

1). It is a generalization saying all published marketing materials used in other works are fair use and that is simply not true,it does depend on how they're used.

2). Something does not always lose it's copyrighted connections when published,mostly not.

1). Example?

2). I don't even understand what you are saying here.  Why would anything lose copyright when published?

1) your own sentence is the example,what i said is a reaction to your sentence."Any photos or videos published for marketing purposes falls under Fair Use for they are published materials."I know you claim it is not a generalization but it is one made about ALL published materials for marketing purposes so it clearly is one,it is strange you try to deny such a clear fact.

2) That is why i tell you that you are wrong calling all things published fair use,because they do not lose copyright and if they do not lose copyright it is a big generalization claiming everything published for marketing is fair use.

That is what the law is and not my moral opinion.

Last edited by Immersiveunreality - on 30 May 2020