By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
chakkra on 29 May 2020
Edit Thread
JWeinCom said:
chakkra said:

We would be falling into the same cycle. You gave me your reasons on why you feel the evidences are not valid, and I disagree with those reasons.
The only way we could settle this is in a court but that´s not possible, so I think it is better just to agree to disagree.

Well... I actually explained why it's invalid... if you actually had a response, then I'd be open to changing my position.  That's the purpose of discussion.  But if your only response is "nuh-uh" then yeah, it's pointless.

No, you explained why YOU feel it's invalid. I already explained the similarities that I find suspicious; you already gave me your reasons why you feel those similarities are not a valid evidence, and I already said that I disagree with the reasons you presented. So really, what else there is to say? 

All discussions don´t need to end with one party changing the other´s mind; like you said, we don´t have access to the creators minds so there is no way to know the actual truth. So yeah, this is all pointless in the end.