Sony DMCA's themselves on Twitter

[Immersiveunreality]

SpokenTruth said:

Immersiveunreality said:

Still debatable in federal court,published material for marketing or not and i'm not talking about this particular scenario but the bolded generalization you made in the previous comment .

But my statement wasn't a generalization.  It was specifically about marketing materials.

"Any photos or videos published for marketing purposes falls under Fair Use for they are published materials."

How in the world is that a generalization and not a specific reference to published marketing materials?

It is a generalization saying all published marketing materials used in other works are fair use and that is simply not true,it does depend on how they're used.

Something does not always lose it's copyrighted connections when published,mostly not.