By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Shaunodon said:
DonFerrari said:

Does the game run only docked? Nope, so you are already admitting it get under for more than 2%? And I haven't moved any posts, so you were the one lying.

And your accusation of spreading lie hardly would apply to 2 posts while also asking how many times does it need to be considered trolling. Your posts would be more on line of flaming than whatever you think I did.

The game drops under the original release (even docked) so I wasn't telling any lies.

Just objectively not true. Like my goodness, spend a couple minutes researching.

I can't say that 2% is perfectly accurate, but I know it's a hell of a lot closer to reality than anything you're saying. I only mentioned portable for the sake of it, but I don't even know why portable mode should matter, when you're comparing it to a version that didn't have one and your statement was, "...a remaster that even got some features being worse than the original like resolution."

How far from the truth are you planning to stray this time?

Does the game run in portable mode? Is Switch a hybrid and Lite a portable only? Since the answer for both is yes, portable is valid.

And even talking only docked 2% or any amount of time under is still under so you can't claim it is a lie much less saying what you are saying is objective true when you yourself admit it does occur, so you would be objectively lying when denying even though you accuse me of lying, very strange.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."