SpokenTruth said:
Immersiveunreality said:
Bold: Yes and no,ultimately the federal court can decide if something is fair use or not by using kinda tranformative rules.
These are the four main rules:
- the purpose and character of your use
- the nature of the copyrighted work
- the amount and substantiality of the portion taken, and
- the effect of the use upon the potential market.
All of these rules are debatable depending on the side/position using them and that is what makes this all a bit tricky.
|
Debatable? No. It's published material for marketing purposes. Not debatable. And nobody is reusing the published material and claiming it as their own.
|
Still debatable in federal court,published material for marketing or not and i'm not talking about this particular scenario but the bolded generalization you made in the previous comment .
NobleTeam360 said:
Immersiveunreality said:
In order to not lose profit and that is understandable.
|
But I was told it was for the Art and the fans!
|
Well,almost nothing is 100 percent one way or the other.
